The Art Of Ad-Lib.

The job description: “You will have the ability to easily and credibly ad-lib during breaking news, unexpected events in your newscast or when your teleprompter crashes.  You will also ask relevant questions of reporters during live shots that add content and help our viewers better understand stories.”

 

As an anchor, that’s a shop where I want to work.  It means management has high expectations of its anchors and believes they should not just be seen, but also heard by viewers.  That takes a lot of work.

 

The art of ad-lib requires good preparation. The best ad-libs are seldom truly spontaneous.  You have to be deeply involved in the content of your newscast.

 

I used to work for a news director who, correctly, prohibited scripted questions because nothing sounds more canned.  So, I would talk with our reporters ahead of time about their story content to see what nugget of information we could discuss on the air unscripted.  That accomplished several things.  It helped me understand their stories better.  If I had to listen to a producer changing the rundown during the live shot, I still had a pretty good idea what the reporter was saying.  Also, a solid expected question gives the reporter a chance to shine with the answer.  She looks good and so do you.

 

The “unexpected” during a newscast comes in many forms, but you can still prepare for a lot of it simply by understanding what could be coming your way.  A few nights ago, a large fight with 400 people involved happened in a tiny town in our viewing area.  Before she went on the air, one of our anchors thought to look up the population of the town so she could calculate the percentage living there involved in the fight.  She was prepared to extend the live shot with our reporter if needed.  Brilliant, because that’s exactly what happened.

 

Your preparation is your responsibility.  Unless you’re working for a network morning show, no one gives you a briefing book.

 

One of the things that helps is to ask the question, how much of this newscast could I really ad lib if I had to?  Not many of us can memorize a newscast, but understanding the content will carry you through a lot when the prompter crashes on the first story…like mine did last night.

———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————-

Cameron Harper is an evening anchor/reporter at WPTY, Memphis.  He has won numerous awards and his motto on Twitter is “the teleprompter is only a suggestion.”  Check him out at www.cameronharper.com and you can follow him on Twitter @NewsCam.

Share

The anchors don’t have any chemistry, can a producer fix it?

This can be a complex problem, that everyone involved needs to help fix.  Truthfully, the bulk of the repair is often placed on the shoulders of the producer.  When you watch a newscast and the anchors just don’t seem to relate to each other, there are ways around to ease the tension.

Creating chemistry

  • One anchor begins, where the other leaves off
  • Talk through chat opportunities
  • Play on anchor’s interests

Again, this article is from a producing perspective.  Anchors, we will talk about how you can build camaraderie later.  Let’s begin by helping anchors play off of each other, through scripting.  These are tried and true techniques to showcase the anchors together in a way that you can control.  The techniques incorporate two shots.  Traditionally producers are taught to use two shots at the beginning of blocks, to start off teases, and to pitch to weather and sports.  The use of a two shot is so much more important though.  It provides a conversational bridge when subjects are related.  To really boil it down, you can use a two shot to build your team when switching from the tag of one story, to the intro of the next.  It shows the anchors working together.  This requires conversational writing.  (read “So Cliché” and “Rule the Word” to make sure you are doing all you can to write like people talk)  Here’s a scenario with anchors “JOHN” and “BETTY” to make it clear:

(JOHN/1 SHOT-TAG)

YOU HAVE UNTIL DECEMBER 2013 TO APPLY FOR THE NEW GOVERNMENT REFINANCE PROGRAM.

(JOHN/TURN TO TWO SHOT)

WE ASKED AROUND TODAY AND A LOT OF HOMEOWNERS ARE REALLY CONF– USED ABOUT HOW TO APPLY.

(BETTY/STILL ON TWO SHOT)

AND WHO TO APPLY WITH.

AFTER ALL… THE GOVERNMENT DOESN’T HAVE A SET OFFICE FOR REFINANCING YOUR HO– USE.

(BETTY/TURN TO DOUBLE BOX)

SO TODAY JOE SCHMO CHECKED… TO MAKE SURE YOU WOULD KNOW WHERE TO GO AND WHAT TO BRING.

JOE IS IT A CONFUSING PROCESS?

This copy provides a mini, controlled conversation between the anchors.  The anchors quickly transition to the next part of the story, there is an opportunity for limited ad lib (when the anchor says government doesn’t have a set office for refinancing your house, the other anchor’s mic can be up so he/she could say, on the fly, something like ”it sure doesn’t”) and the anchors  are working together to get the answers viewers want.  I often used two shot transitions like this to build team.  Then, I single anchor pitched to weather or sports more often.  Those two anchor pitches to weather and sports almost always appear forced.  You have to do one token 3 shot pitch to build team somewhere.  But that doesn’t mean do it every time you take weather, especially in an hour long newscast.

When you do have opportunities to chat to build team (like the pitch to weather) ask the anchors to plan it out for you.  Have whomever actually pitches to weather go to the meteorologist to ask about what’s first in the forecast.  Yes, it is easier for you to just throw a line in, since you talk with the weather person anyway.  But the point is to help the anchors build relationships.  The hope is that going in to ask that question before the newscast will lead to a conversation so the anchors continue to find ways to relate to each other.

Here’s another technique to help with chat:  I used to write only the words “ad lib” in at least one tag per newscast (usually on a lighter story) to force the anchors to talk to each other and come up with a plan for chat somewhere in the show, other than weather and sports.  I made sure the anchors looked at that script well before the show.  The rest was up to the anchors to hash out.  If I had awesome video, I would take a two shot coming out, with at most a factoid in there, so the two anchors would have to talk to each other.  This often helped break the ice a bit.

It can be also very effective to have one anchor read a story about a subject the other anchor really likes.  Then you go to a two shot at the very end of the tag.  It can make for a great ad lib opportunity.  I had an anchor that loved Halle Berry.  (Anytime he said her name he would actually blush!)  So sometimes I had the other anchor read the story about Halle Berry, then say the last line of the tag on a two shot.  I did that just so we could catch the other anchor blushing a bit.  Even if they didn’t ad lib, the look between them was priceless!  His co-anchor would smile and roll her eyes as he blushed.  It was a very human, relatable moment.  This is another reason why it is important to learn about your anchors and their personal interests (see “How to get inside your anchors heads and write in their voices”).

The most important thing to keep in mind when trying to create chemistry, is keeping the moments of interaction brief.  Again, that doesn’t mean avoiding two shots.  It means using two shots more as a transition in the middle of news blocks, and less as a way to chat and possibly fill time in places like weather and sports.  As the anchors get used to playing off each other, the chemistry often starts to jell.  You just have to give it time and some gentle nudges.

 

Share

What’s with the question? Make sure there’s an answer.

We recently got a Tweet from a frustrated journalist who had just watched a live shot from another station in another market.  In that live shot the anchor asked a question to the reporter, and the question was not answered until the tag.  The story came across as oversold and uncomfortable.

Sound familiar?  The flow from anchor intro, to reporter live shot, to pkg, to live tag, to anchor tag is delicate to begin with.  Then a whole bunch of writers step in, each with their own voice and tweak.  The finished product often becomes forced and everyone looks uncomfortable or worse yet, detached from the information described.  Then comes the big kicker: The consultant comes to town and tells the ND that the field crews and anchor desk must interact and seem engaged with each other.  So what is management’s solution?  Require anchors to ask reporters a question going into live shots.  Then comes situations like the one at the start of this article.  But it doesn’t have to be that way.  There are solutions.

First, the one question you never want to ask: “Joe are you live at the scene now?”  Before you chuckle and roll your eyes, I lost count of how many times I had to copy edit that type of pitch question out of intros.  It was constant, in every market size. Also, make sure the reporter knows the question is coming and what it is. That way the reporter doesn’t seem clueless. Remember, IFB can and does go in and out,  you want the live shot to start out smoothly. The reason managers ask you to use a question in the pitch line is to make the interaction between the anchor and reporter seem like a conversation.  When you think about it, most conversations do begin with a question and an answer.  The person answering expands on the answer then, asks another question to move the conversation along.

With that in mind, here are some techniques to keep anchor questions required in the intro from seeming forced:

  • Reference live surroundings in the question
  • Provide perspective through the question
  • Write what a viewer ask

Now let’s delve deeper, so these are clear.  Remember this exercise is supposed to help the anchor and reporter talk with each other, instead of at each other.  It is one of the many ways you create flow within a newscast.  So when writing the question in the pitch line, a natural way to transition is to ask about why the reporter is live at a particular place.  Things like, “Joe can you walk us through the situation where you are?” makes the anchor seem authoritative and the reporter seem like an expert eyewitness.  Another way to reference live surroundings is to give anchors the freedom to know they can ask about what they see in the live picture with the reporter.  This is effective during fires, standoffs, fairs, holiday parties, political events… you get the idea.  You can also have the reporter tell the producer if something interesting is going on, right before taking the shot.  Then the anchor can ad lib with that information.  Something like, “Joe, we’re hearing another fire truck just arrived, where is it and why was it called in?”  If the live surroundings are stagnant (which is often the case) you can have the anchor ask something informative about the area like, “Joe, that’s usually a quiet neighborhood how are families there reacting to this situation?”  All of these scenarios give the reporter a reason to reference why he/she is live.  That is part of the natural flow of a conversation.  Think of it like this, if you bump into a friend at the store, you often say “Hey, what are you shopping for today?”  The person answers usually by pointing to the aisle he/she either just went down or will head down next.  The key for this type of pitch question is to transition to what is immediately next in the live report.

Now, let’s talk about using questions for perspective.  This is where pitch questions can often go wrong, like the scenario at the beginning of this article.  You must ask a question that provides an immediate answer.  No waiting until the package or tag.  If your reporter is at a boring scene and is doing a story that’s been done over and over, use the pitch question to help show what’s new.  Use something like, “Joe, before we were told the tax cut would be small, why is it possibly going up now?”  Or “Last night we were told this was an accident, why are investigators calling it intentional now?”  You are showing that the anchor remembers what he/she tells people and that there is something new.  Again, before you snicker, sit down and watch a newscast.  It is excruciating how often anchor intros are written in ways that make the anchor seems clueless about the subject, especially when it’s an ongoing story.  The cheap copout way to write an intro is to fake that the subject is new by providing no perspective.  If you are struggling with ways to justify why this information is being given to the viewer again, let the anchor be the antagonist of sorts and ask that very thing of the reporter.  “Joe, we’ve been talking about this political issue for a week, why do families need to hear about it tonight?”  That’s a natural question someone probably asked in the editorial meeting when you decided to cover the story.  So let the anchor ask it of the reporter in the intro.

Which leads to the kinds of questions viewers would ask:  Put the viewer benefit, front and center.  (If you don’t know what viewer benefit means read “What’s in it for me.”)  Now consider this:  Anchors are considered the voice of the audience.  They are the people who can ask what viewers want to know, but don’t have the means to ask.  Use that connection between anchor and audience to craft questions to the reporter.  Let your anchor be gutsy with questions like, “Joe, a lot of people think this tax cut is a joke, is it?” Or “Joe, does this really mean (star player) is walking away from the team?” Or “Joe, there have been a lot of break-ins in this area lately, what makes this one different?” Again, think about bumping into a friend and briefly catching up.  Most of us have similar things to say each time, so our friend prods with questions to see if there are any changes.  People expect to hear some of the same information, but appreciate anchors asking what is different.

Finally, understand that questions can be a crutch.  It is such a common technique, that it can be over used.  But if done correctly, it will not seem forced.  Remember, asking questions is human nature.  So don’t fear questions, just make sure the reporter gets to the answer right away.

Share

Newsflash, your EP doesn’t have ESP! How to clue them in and form an alliance.

Being an EP is a weird little world.  You are a manager for sure, with a lot of responsibility.  But you sit in the newsroom all day long and work in the trenches.  You have this element in common with another prominent figure on your shift, the anchor, but often the two don’t connect.  It fascinated me as a producer for years.  The EP and the anchor would rarely speak.  I, the producer, was caught in the middle all the time, newsroom after newsroom.  Then I became an EP and tried to change this relationship.  What I found was fascinating.  Time and again, my anchors assumed I knew everything going on in their world and they would actually avoid telling me about any issues.  They even became frustrated if I regularly tried to check in to make sure I was aware of any needs they had.

I am guessing that being a manager made me seem a little untrustworthy.  Understandable since EP’s do weigh in on annual reviews.  But the anchors that did sit down with me and clue me into their expectations succeeded better at their jobs.  The reason:  I could fix problems for them.  I was able to make my expectations crystal clear as well.  To me, having both sides understand the other is only beneficial.  So, anchors, here’s how to forge a relationship with an EP, since we unfortunately don’t have ESP and always know what you need:

  • Set up regular check in sessions to make sure you’re on same page
  • Compliment and critique
  • Be the key backup

First of all set up regular check in sessions to make sure you are on the same page with your EP.  This is a two way street, but you have to ask for it.  I used to try and sit down once a month and just ask my anchors how everything was going.  Did they have any segments they liked?  How was the writing?  Were they getting enough time to ad lib?  Were they getting enough guidance when given breaking news on set?  Sometimes my anchors would candidly provide answers, which I appreciated immensely.  Other times my anchor would say everything’s fine, then go off and bad mouth situations.  Often they would do this just a few hours later and in the hallway where I could easily walk up and hear it (and often did).  If you are given an opportunity to spell out your likes and dislikes, do it.  Otherwise keep your mouth shut in the building!  Not openly talking about what you need, and instead trashing the situation in the hallway makes you look immature.  That means the EP will develop concerns over your ability to lead.  When it’s time to get a new higher level show, that EP will not endorse you.

During check in sessions, you should complement and critique.  It is very beneficial to know what’s working for you as well as what isn’t.  Remember even EP’s need to know if something they are doing or their producers are doing is going great.  Compliments are rare in most newsrooms.  They help boost morale and help the EP figure out what your likes/needs are so they can pass the information down to appropriate staffers.  As for critiques, I know what it is like to have a manager call you in and ask for a critique when you know they actually don’t want to hear it.  These check in sessions should be clearly defined so your criticisms are understood to be constructive.  Also, the EP has final say in whether some of the issues you bring up are addressed, how and when.  Frankly, some things you bring up, the EP may deem not that important.  Be professional enough to see that perspective as well.

Finally, EP’s need people to back them up sometimes, especially if they are making major changes to a newscast.  Back the EP up.  Tell the staff that change can be good.  Be a cheerleader (see Smart Alliances).   This will go a long way toward winning major loyalty from the EP.  Remember, when you’re trashing major formatting changes, most of the time they already went up through higher channels than you and the EP.  To rip them, especially in a group setting, is not in your best interest.  This is where your leadership role really comes in for the newscast.  Often if the anchor says an idea is worth a try, the staff supports attempting the plan.  Your support will go a long way toward winning a major ally, your EP.

 

Share