What survivetvnewsjobs has taught me. A note from the founder.

Survivetvnewsjobs was born in February of 2011.  In that short amount of time, it has become a place where journalists find practical advice to situations they face in newsrooms each day.  It also has become a place to hop online using Twitter and Facebook to share ideas, network and mentor.

All this time, most of you had no idea where the information was coming from.  I was never trying to hide my identity.  I simply wanted the focus to be on the content of the site.  But now, I want to formally introduce myself.  My name is Beth Johnson.  I’m a former EP and producer and the founder of survivetvnewsjobs.com.

Why now?  For several reasons.  The website has gained enough exposure that I am getting called out a bit from college professors and industry leaders.  I am also starting to be asked to speak on behalf of TV journalists about issues we face.  And I have also just accepted a job offer, with MediaStars to do something no other agency has tried:  Represent producers and managers, with an ambitious goal, to raise pay, especially for producers and EP’s.  (On air people are welcome to call me also by the way.)  Survivetvnewsjobs will not be used to convince you to get representation.  That is not, never was and never will be the goal.

From day one, this website has been all about sharing practical advice.  It was designed to let journalists have a voice about the industry they love.  Initially, I had contributors who were afraid to put their names on articles for fear of possible conflicts with their employers.  That’s why the website began with no bio.

Then something awesome happened!  Journalists began writing for the website, and were able to safely sign their names.  Newsroom managers started passing out some of the articles and talking about them with staff members.  Professors began passing out articles to discuss with soon to be journos.  The overwhelmingly positive feedback is humbling and inspiring.  I appreciate it immensely, and I respect the trust you have put in this site and in the discussions we have had.

So today, I am sharing what this site has taught me so far.  Just like when I was in the daily grind, journalists need to connect with each other and share ideas. They need to raise a flag if their pay doesn’t seem to match up to their peers.  Journalists need training and support.  Many believe this biz is great and has the potential to be even better.  Newsies are looking for ways to network, so they can help each other grow and make the most of the jobs they love.  This website fulfills an important need.

Survivetvnewsjob will remain, just that:  A place for you to connect, grow and compare notes.  What all of you have created with me is too important to give up.  I will still offer just as many articles and discussions on Twitter and FB.  You will hear about MediaStars in occasional fashion articles, because frankly, so many of you responded, and liked the advice and debates.  You will also see a MediaStars ad banner, but that’s about it.

I am asking for one thing in return.  If you have a topic you are passionate about and can offer positive solutions, submit an article for review or send me your idea.  This website was not designed to be just one person’s voice all the time.  Help keep the discussion going and allow this website to be what it’s always been intended for:  Helping journalists survive their TV news jobs.

Share

Want a great writing critique? Ask a photojournalist.

Yes, you read the title of this article correctly.  If you want a really great writing critique, ask the guys and gals who focus on the images.  Why?  Because, in television news, the words are dependent on the images.  The video and sound should truly tell the story.  This is even true when using graphics to explain a subject.  The visuals, combined with sound and words, are what makes this medium such an incredible pull for viewers. (despite the smaller screen you are using to read this article.)

Photojournalists really understand the powerful connection between the images and the words.  They also know a lot of tricks to help you work around it when the stories are not as visually appealing as you would like.  If you ever get a chance, sit down and watch a newscast with a photojournalist.  It is fascinating to hear their rants vs. the rants of non-photogs in the business.  Will you agree with everything?  Probably not.  But you will gain a lot of insight from the thought processes of a very visual mind.

So while you listen to the critique, keep an ear out for how many times the photojournalist mentions that a story did not make sense.  My guess is you will hear that pretty often.  Then take a closer look at the story.  Chances are your copy and the visuals do not mesh at all.  It really is fascinating to watch how often that happens in TV news.  There is a large disconnect, especially in vo’s and vosots between the visuals and the words being used to describe the story.

Photojournalists help you understand just that.  Your words describe the story.  They don’t simply tell it.  There is a difference in TV news.  Let a photog help you see that for yourself.  Get a critique.  Who knows, the insight could make your writing style even better.

 

Share

I got my first gig, and can’t pay my bills…

To be honest, I think J-schools should offer personal finance seminars on this subject.  You are warned that money will be tight at first, but it doesn’t prepare you for the grim reality.  Even with a roommate, I struggled badly.  I had student loans and a car payment.  (My car engine blew up on the way home from the interview for my first job… got stranded on the interstate… fun story!)  Dealing with that and the stress of figuring out the job entailed was tough. From what I’m hearing from some of you, this hasn’t changed.  Sometimes even after the first job!

Recently I asked for input on ways to help save money during that first gig.  Many savings pro’s sent great ideas.  Here they are.

Coupon

There are great websites that spell out how to do this (Southernsavers.com is a great example). The key: match up coupons with items that are also on sale at a store.

 

Consign

As in buy clothes at a consignment shop.  Speaking of clothes, remember you can get great clothes without spending a bundle.  If you plan to splurge, do it to have the clothes you buy fitted (see Dress for success).  I actually was surprised at the deals some of you mentioned finding.

Drive an old car

As I mentioned earlier, my engine blew up on the way home from the interview.  Having to lease a car was debilitating for me.  It frankly forced me to move to another job more quickly because I needed money desperately.  If you have an older car that still runs and the repairs cost less than a car payment, run that baby into the ground.  The savings truly is worth the trouble.

 

Pack lunch

This may sound silly, but it makes a huge difference.  Huge!  The other great part, you probably will eat healthier and take fewer sick days and that will be a great reason to ask for a raise in a year or so.

 

Happy Hour

Many people mentioned this as a great way to blow off steam without spending a bundle.  Cheap drinks are often paired with cheap or free food.  Bottom line, you are young and need/deserve to have some fun.  Why not go for it when you can spend less?

 

Now a few more ideas that may take a little more research, but could really pay off.

 

Save up for first job

Yes, this is for interns, college students.  If at all possible work summer jobs or a part time gig and save the money while you are in school.  Use it to supplement once you get that first gig. This is where I wish J-schools provided an elective course on personal finance.  By the time many realize how little you truly make, you are a summer away from working.  So please, tell any underclassmen you know who want to work in news: Save now.

 

See if you can defer student loans

Check this idea out.  Some people have had luck at this. Call Sallie Mae and see if you qualify.  Just know it can take 10 years to pay loans off, so don’t hold off too long.

 

Avoid credit cards

This may seem obvious to great journalistic minds, but I know many who are still desperately trying to pay off the debts from those first few years working.  Credit card debt is a beast!  You write stories about it.  Remember them.

 

Go in with a financial plan

How do you plan with no money?  There are ways.  If your family has a great financial planner, go in and ask what you can do with your earnings.  If you don’t have a planner you trust, start by reading “Automatic Millionaire.”  Don’t chuckle.  Some of the examples in there are from people who likely never earned what you will.  They were smart with their money from day one, and ended up very secure.  If you can take a financial planning course of some sort, do it.  Because starting salaries are low, we have less of a chance to make it right.  So start off on a smart path if you possibly can.

 

Finally, remember it does get better.  The sacrifices should pay off, even nowadays with salaries on the down side.

Share

What’s lacking in training for TV news? Ask us (that means you too)!

       

        “Rules are made to be broken, but first you have to know the rules.”

 

By now you have probably read that J-schools were called on to change the way they teach by the Knight Foundation.  In its “Open Letter to American University Presidents” the group calls for a “teaching hospital” style curriculum. (Basically you work alongside professionals to really learn the craft.)  When I asked journalists about this, and what they would like to see change, I got a lot of kudos for universities that had producing classes and ran “newsrooms” where students put on the news.  Glad to hear you are happy with your educations overall.  But, I think this call to action goes beyond that.

So, I threw together some ideas on what journalists really need to know from the get go. Now I’m asking you to add to it.  After all, we live it.  We know what’s there and what’s missing.

Understanding subjects to handle a beat.

Think back to your first job.  Did you know military lingo? Did you understand cop speak so you could decode it for viewers to understand?  Could you clearly explain how the election process really works (Heck that’s a valid question on 4th job.)?  Let’s be honest, phrases like “firefighters responded to a three alarm fire” happen a lot in news copy because many journalists don’t truly know what it means.  So instead of potentially screwing it up, journalists just repeat the information the information they are given by the officials.  Reporting classes should decipher systems and lingo so you have a clue what’s going on from the moment you get in the TV news job force.  I mean they need to teach the things we tend to cover most: fires, murders, crashes, elections, school millage rates, the GNP (do you at least know what that acronym means?) and unemployment stats.  Is your head spinning yet?  Then focus on how to break those types of story elements down in layman’s terms.  That way viewers know what the heck your point is.  It goes back to the simple idea that rules are made to be broken, but first you have to know the rules.  Now think about your first economics story (or even your last one because that subject is a real bugger) and the first time you had to take a campaign ad and break down the true and false elements on various issues.  It’s hard if you don’t understand the basic principles.  It can take several attempts to get it right.  Some of you may be thinking, “Well, I took an economics class.” or “I’m a poly sci minor.”  Sometimes even that isn’t enough to break it down for TV viewers.  A lot of those classes are theory.  This is real world application stuff.  You need the systems explained clearly, not a discussion on theories.  If you understand those systems and the lingo, you can write about it clearly in news stories and school essays.  Know the rules, then you can move past them.

Source building

This, to me, is one of the biggest problems in newsrooms today.  So few people truly “get” how to source build.  There are a lot of techniques involved, ethical issues, people and networking skills.  We’ve dedicated articles under the cloud tag “source”.  But they just scratch the surface.  If you really sit and think about it, in the majority of TV newsrooms there are 1 or 2 reporters (besides the investigative team) and an assignment editor that have incredible sources.  The rest, well, not so much.  Source building does not come as naturally as it may seem, even in the age of social media.  That’s why it needs to be taught in college journalism programs.

Social media interaction

When I asked what J-Schools should improve on, a few journalists mentioned social media.  What writing style do you use on the social web, “newspaper” or “broadcast”?  What is proper etiquette?  What potential legal pitfalls could you run into?  Heck, many of us “veteran journalists” would go back to school to take these sorts of classes, if we could.  Again, we need to know the basic rules, before we can break them and begin to evolve.

Cross training

The most common suggestion I heard from journalists?  Cross training. That even came from some newsies who went to the universities that taught reporting, producing and photojournalism classes.  I am going to confess to one of the largest reasons I launched survivetvnewsjobs.com: Too often, journalists are disconnected in newsrooms.  The reporter does not get what the producer needs.  The producer doesn’t get what the anchor needs.  No one seems to understand what the assignment editor needs.  And reporters and photojournalists sit in the same news vehicle all day, and often are not recognizing the challenges the other faces.  Simply put, few know the rules their teammates live under.  There are two whole categories on the website relating to these issues: “Getting along with Peers” and “Smart Alliances.”   “Getting along with Peers” is one of the most searched for and read sections.  The reason:  journalists want to understand why other key players in the newsroom act like they do.  That’s crucial because we journalists waste time trying to explain things that we should not have to explain.  It can hamper the product each day.  It prohibits open discussions in news editorial meetings.  Then people get “human” and start demanding “just trust me.”  This is not a trust issue. This is a productivity issue.  This is the cog in the wheel that prevents us from breaking the rules and evolving.  Turning a few newscasts as a producer; turning a few packages one semester as a reporter and shooting a few pieces as a photojournalist does not make you an expert.  It simply is not enough to allow you to really understand the daily pressures of these jobs.  But it might be enough if you combine  doing these things, in a newsroom setting, with talking about real world scenarios with veteran journalists.  Let longtime producers explain why they start snapping at reporters three hours before the show.  Let them explain why not turning in the tease video earlier than the pkg creates a multilevel nightmare.  They can also hash out why missing slot is really bad for the entire newscast.  Let veteran reporters explain why holding off on script approval can really screw over a field crew.  How about hearing from a well-seasoned pro why sending an anchor to the set 10 minutes before air, with no a-block scripts (because they aren’t written yet!) will potentially wreak havoc for the next two blocks of news, if not the entire newscast.  Then let’s discuss the reporter driving the live truck while the photojournalist sits in the back slam editing the pkg desperately trying to make slot, because of equipment failure or bad weather.  Real life scenarios do not always play out in these university “newsrooms.” Discussion groups involving veteran journalists, in every newsroom role, can help fill in the gaps.

There are many more issues we could bring up.  Please, FB with more of your ideas.  If we get enough, we’ll send them and this article to the Knight Foundation.  After all, it’s our vocation.  We deserve to lay out the rules, so we can help break them and evolve our profession.

Share